Friday, January 22, 2016

When Local School Boards Get it Right: Marlboro Reduces Local Testing and Values PARCC

It’s so easy to hate your local school board. Trust me on this: I’ve been a school board member for almost twelve years and I get the animus. We sit there primly at public meetings and officiously fling about arcane acronyms like confetti at a New Year’s party. We raise your taxes. We go to Atlantic City for the annual School Boards convention on your dime.  We have tense relationships with local unions who represent beloved teachers. We spend hours debating esoteric policies.

But once in a while we get things right. Today’s example of a laudable school board comes by way of  Monmouth County's Marlboro Public Schools, a white, wealthy suburb with an median household income of $130,400 and an average house cost of $648,041. Only 3.7% of students at Marlboro Middle School are economically-disadvantaged. There are so few black students (1.8%) there that they don’t even qualify as a subgroup.

Hence, Marlboro – suburban, white, wealthy – would appear to be the perfect incubator for an opt-out-of-PARCC movement, a natural ally of Save Our Schools-NJ and NJEA. In fact, last year Marlboro had the odd distinction of beating out every other Monmouth County school districts in opt-out rates. There, NJEA gloated, 37% of students, or 1,960 out of 5,200,  declined to participate in the new Common Core-aligned assessments.

But there’s been a change. According to the Asbury Park Press, the School Board, administrators, teachers, and parents have united around a far more reasonable solution to over-testing than boycotts. Last year Superintendent Eric Hibbs stuck to his guns about the importance of assessing students in college and career-ready standards. "Education today is not easy," the superintendent said at a public meeting last December. “I'd rather have you unhappy with me for adequately preparing our kids for what they're going to see in high school."

And this year the district remains faithful to PARCC (results were just fine, by the way) and is, instead, reducing tests that are under district control, not state mandated assessments. At a public meeting earlier this week, Hibbs said, “"There has to be a happy medium. I want to see more projects in the classroom. We want kids to be collaborative. We want to see innovation."

After all, PARCC tests take only about 9 hours a year. Local assessments – midterms, finals, quizzes, pre-tests, post-tests – take far more time. Those truly interested in reducing testing should follow the lead of Marlboro’s school board, families, and administrators and focus on local assessments.


Michele Rice said...

Focus on local assessments? That's not parcc, dear...

Eric S. said...

Unfortunately, based upon your statement that PARCC only encompasses 9 hours a year. you cannot truly have a grasp on the time attributable to PARCC testing and what is really happening in the schools, which is a shame for a school board member and self professed education commentator. The amount of time schools spend preparing students to take the PARCC, including practice tests and the time spent with instruction only suited to answering PARCC questions rather than learning, probably incorporates over a hundred hours. I am glad you are not part of the Marlboro BOE, where my students go. And your understanding of the content of the Marlboro BOE meeting is incorrect. The meeting was a great example of parents exercising their rights to ensure their children truly learn, rather than go through a endless regime of testing, which only seems to benefit Pearson. The Marlboro BOE seems to encompass a good group, who now realize the community's concerns and I believe they will act accordingly. The Administration will be coming on board; if not there will likely be changes. And I believe it is unlikely that Governor Christie will enact mandatory PARCC testing based upon his run for President and the view of government's role held by the voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. Anyone who wants to run for Governor in NJ will also realize that, as well as any assembly members seeking reelection in November.

Blogger said...

Are you paying over $5 / pack of cigarettes? I'm buying my cigarettes at Duty Free Depot and this saves me over 50%.