Question for the Day: How Much Did NJEA Pay to Protect Each Ineffective Teacher?

On Monday the New Jersey Department of  Education released its Final Educator Evaluation Implementation Report, which provides data on the first year that N.J. linked student test scores on standardized tests  to teacher evaluations. This is part of the TEACHNJ law, originally applauded by NJEA (after legislators removed the section that substituted teacher effectiveness for seniority during lay-offs).

After all the data-crunching, 97.2% of N.J. teachers and principals were found to be either effective or highly-effective. Or, 2.8% of the state teaching corps was rated ineffective or partially effective.

Some critics have jeered at the 2.8%, which comes out to 2,900 educators  out of N.J.'s 113,126 teachers and 4,058 principals. Here’s a reminder: in order to defuse a riot, as well as some misbegotten anti-PARCC legislation, Gov. Christie issued an Executive Order that lowered TEACHNJ’s link of 30% student growth data to 10%. Statehouse leaders have suggested that N.J. retain that 10% link for at least an additional year.  That's  either wimpy or wise.

Speaking of labor union support, NJEA, according to various reports, spent as much as $15 million on its opt-out-of-PARCC campaign, mainly directed at high-income suburban parents who don’t worry about their schools’ language arts and math proficiency rates. Only fifteen percent of teachers -- those who teach 4th-7th grade language arts and math – receive mSGP (Student Growth Percentile) ratings. So, out of the 2,900 ineffective teachers,  that’s 483 teachers whose ineffective ratings are tied to PARCC data. This means that NJEA paid  $32,000 to protect each ineffective teacher.  Your teacher dues at work. Or, if you really want to follow the money, your state and local taxes.